How We Review: Our Criteria, Written Down So You Can Hold Us To Them
A guide that will not say how it works is asking for trust it has not earned. This page is the method: the eight checks behind every operator description here, the point at which our evidence runs out, and what commercial arrangements do and do not buy. It is deliberately short, because a methodology you cannot read in five minutes is decoration. JILIAPP is an independent guide: not a casino, no deposits, no games, no scores, no rankings. 21+.
The eight checks
| What we check | How we check it | The honest limit |
|---|---|---|
| Licence disclosure | Look for a named regulator and licence identity in text, then compare it with that regulator's own published list | It is a snapshot. A licence can lapse without the page being updated |
| Payment rails | Read which wallets and transfer networks the cashier names, and whether the site and the app agree | We cannot tell you speed, fees or limits; those are the operator's and live in its cashier |
| Terms clarity | Time how long it takes to find wagering, expiry, maximum bet during a bonus, and withdrawal conditions | Almost none: this is a direct test of a document anyone can open |
| KYC rules | Check whether identity requirements are stated before deposit, and which documents are listed | We see the policy, never how it was applied to a particular account |
| Complaint route | Look for a named internal escalation and a named external one, reachable without asking an agent | Publication is checkable. Resolution is not |
| Responsible-gaming tools | Note which of deposit limit, loss limit, reminders, cool-off and self-exclusion are offered, and whether they are self-serve | Whether a limit holds in practice is only visible from inside an account |
| Support channels | List which channels exist, their stated hours, and whether each is operator-controlled rather than a social account | Response quality cannot be sampled fairly from outside |
| App distribution | Look at how the operator expects you to install, and whether it is honest about sideloading or publishes mirrors | Little: distribution practice is openly visible |
The third column is the part most review sites leave out, and leaving it out is what turns a description into a sales page.
Two kinds of sentence
There are only two kinds of statement about an operator on this site. One reports something published, and you can open the same document and see it. The other reports a claim, and says so with words like states, asserts or claims. We keep those apart on purpose, because mixing them is how a reader ends up believing something nobody ever verified.
- Verifiable: licence claims and their presence on a regulator list, terms wording, cashier rails, published channels, install practice, which responsible-gaming tools are offered
- Not verifiable from outside an account: payout speed, fees, minimums, account decisions, how support behaves when it matters
- Not verifiable by anyone at all: that a game is due, that a system beats the house edge, or that a session proves anything about a published RTP
Why no score and no ranking
A score implies a measurement and a weighting that we do not have. We can tell you that a wagering requirement was three clicks from the home page or buried in a PDF; turning that into a number out of ten, and standing it next to a payout speed nobody here has observed, would make the page easier to skim and less true. There is no ranked list of operators for the same reason: ranking claims produces a league table of marketing rather than of operators.
What money cannot buy here
Some outbound links on this site may be partner links, which means a commission is possible if a reader follows one and later signs up. That pays for the site, and disclosing it is part of the method rather than small print. What it does not do is change any wording. No payment buys an adjective, moves a page, deletes a criticism, or gets an operator a look before publication.
Use this on any site, including this one: look for the unflattering sentence about the thing being linked to. If no page can produce one, the site is advertising with review furniture.
Revisions
Pages are rewritten when what they describe changes: a licence claim appears or vanishes, a terms document is reissued, a payment rail is dropped, a channel closes. The date on a page is the date of that check, not a freshness ornament. A demonstration that something here is wrong is a reason to change it, and the only one that works reliably.
Standing disclosures
- Independent and not an operator: no deposits are accepted here and no game is run here.
- Nobody here has tested a withdrawal or timed a payout, and no page will pretend otherwise.
- No named human reviewer is presented as an authority, because a byline you cannot check is not evidence.
- Operator-specific numbers belong to the operator; read them in its cashier.
- Gambling is restricted to adults aged 21 and over, and it has a cost that accumulates.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why are there no ratings on this site?
Because a rating implies a measurement, and most of what can be learned about an operator from outside is a claim. Findings are written as sentences instead, with the weighing left to you.
Do you get paid for links?
Possibly. Some outbound links may be partner links that pay a commission after a sign-up. No payment changes wording, order or criticism, and no operator previews a page.
Why will you not state withdrawal times or fees?
Because we cannot verify them and they are not ours to set. They are the operator's and are published in its cashier, which is where you should read them.
Is there an author name?
No. The criteria are published instead. Judge the pages on whether each claim traces back to a document you can open yourself.
Can you help with a dispute?
No. This site has no access to any account and cannot move money. The route is operator support, then your e-wallet or bank through their own app, then the regulator, then the cybercrime authorities.